By 2026 a growing share of your visitors are AI agents and answer engines. Can they actually CONSUME your site? We check the six machine-readability signals — llms.txt, llms-full.txt, structured data, author markup, sameAs entity links and markdown alternates — into one 0–100 agent-readiness score.
Agent-readiness measures whether AI agents and answer engines — ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews — can actually consume your pages, not merely find them. This tool returns a free 0–100 consumability score built from the offline signals that decide it: an llms.txt index, per-page markdown alternates, JSON-LD schema, named authors, and sameAs entity grounding. It matters because an engine that cannot cleanly parse and attribute your content will summarize a competitor instead of citing you.
Agent-readiness measures whether AI engines can consume and parse your site (consumability); AI visibility measures whether they already cite you. You have to be consumable before you can be cited.
75 and above is 'ready', 50–74 is 'partial', and below 50 is 'not ready'. The weighting favors schema (30 points) and llms.txt (20), so those two carry most of the difference.
It is not strictly required, but an llms.txt index plus its llms-full.txt companion give agents a clean, curated entry point instead of forcing them to crawl rendered HTML — which is why they are worth 30 of the 100 points here.
Answer engines weight attributable expertise: a named author with sameAs links to real profiles signals E-E-A-T, making your claims safer to quote than anonymous content.
Free tools show you WHAT to fix. The full audit + the autonomous team of 20 AI agents fix it end-to-end — strategy, content, GEO, internal links, publishing and day-2 upkeep.
All free tools →cookies
The Matrix already knows everything about you — cookies are small change by comparison. The choice, as always, is yours: