Paste a page URL — we check the 14 signals AI engines use to decide whether to cite you. Free, a couple of seconds.
A GEO check evaluates whether a specific page is built for AI answer engines — ChatGPT, Perplexity and Google's AI Overviews — to quote it as a source. These engines don't cite whole sites; they lift self-contained passages that carry a clear answer, verifiable facts and machine-readable markup, so a page that ranks well in classic search can still be invisible to AI. Scoring those signals shows exactly why a URL does or doesn't get pulled into generated answers.
Classic ranking rewards whole-page relevance, while AI engines quote self-contained passages with clear answers and verifiable facts. A page can rank well yet lack the answer-first structure, citable data or crawler access that generative engines require.
No — AI answer engines pull sources from across the results, not just the top spot. A well-structured page ranking on page two can be cited over a poorly structured page-one result.
Yes — but check the right crawler. For ChatGPT search citations that's OAI-SearchBot (GPTBot is only the training crawler); for Perplexity it's PerplexityBot; and Google AI Overviews rely on the standard Googlebot index, not Google-Extended (which only governs Gemini/Vertex use). If robots.txt blocks the crawler an engine actually uses to fetch answer sources, that engine can't cite you — so confirm access before anything else.
For most pages it's the opening paragraph: rewriting the lede into a direct, self-contained answer to the page's core question gives engines a clean passage to quote. The checker ranks fixes by impact so you can start there.
Free tools show you WHAT to fix. The full audit + the autonomous team of 20 AI agents fix it end-to-end — strategy, content, GEO, internal links, publishing and day-2 upkeep.
All free tools →cookies
The Matrix already knows everything about you — cookies are small change by comparison. The choice, as always, is yours: