42 checks — one list of what to fix first
A complete SEO report over the RENDERED site, not your source files. Forty-two checks — E-E-A-T, structure, coverage, dupes, schema conflicts, safety — collapsed into one prioritized list. No wall of reports: you see what to tackle first.
Final price depends on site size & scope — confirmed before any work.
Twenty checks, collapsed into one priority
A big audit usually becomes a wall of reports nobody finishes. We run the site through about twenty independent checks — E-E-A-T and trust, structure and headings, topic coverage, meaning-level duplicates, schema, safety — and collapse it all into a single list.
The list is sorted by payoff: blockers tied to specific pages first, then tasks ranked by impact × effort. One problem page is one line — no duplicated signals.
You get a plan you work top-down, seeing the effect immediately — instead of guessing which of two hundred lines actually matters.
Two failures at once. A 200-page audit nobody reads — unclear what matters, what is noise, what to do first. And the checks themselves read your SOURCE files, so anything born at BUILD time stays invisible: two components each injecting valid markup, a colour contrast decided by the rendered page, a heading that only collapses at 390px.
We audit the rendered site and hand back one list: blockers per page first, then tasks by payoff. We know the build-time class exists because we found it on ourselves — 11 of our own 414 marked-up pages declared the same schema type twice, every block valid on its own.
What's included
How it works
Run the checks
Around 20 audits across the whole site in one pass.
Dedupe and rank
We collapse repeats and sort by payoff.
Hand over the plan
One list: the most important at the top.
What's different
Questions
What does a full SEO report cover?
Forty-two checks — E-E-A-T, structure, topic coverage, dupes, schema conflicts, safety, titles — distilled into one prioritized «fix-first» list.
How is this different from the free checkers?
The free tools each answer one question about one page. The paid report runs the whole set over your RENDERED site and, more importantly, catches what only exists after the build. Example from our own site: 11 pages of 414 declared the same schema type twice, because two components each injected their own valid block. No source-file linter reports that, and neither does a single-page checker.
Can I buy just the audit, without ongoing work?
Yes. It is a one-off report you can hand to any team — yours, an agency, or a contractor. Nothing in it depends on us doing the fixes.
How is it different from the semantic and technical audits?
It's the umbrella: it folds many checks (including technical and some semantic) into one priority. The semantic and technical audits are deeper standalone slices.
Does site size affect the price?
Yes — bigger sites mean more work, so the final price depends on page count.
What's the output?
One report: blockers per page plus a ranked task list.
Related services
Technical audit + CWV
Speed, indexing, schema, internal link equity.
from $990 from →Semantic audit
Pages competing for one meaning: dupes, cannibalization, orphans.
from $690 from →← All services
We'll build the whole site turnkey — new or your existing one. Or take a single slice: semantics, GEO, technical, content, auto-pilot. With a clear starting price.
Services →Get one list of what to fix first
We'll send a prioritized audit for your site.