Serving Googlebot different content than real users is cloaking — a manual-action risk. Paste a URL — we fetch it as Googlebot and as a normal browser and compare status, content size and title.
Cloaking is serving one version of a page to search-engine crawlers and a different version to human visitors — a Google spam-policy violation that can trigger a manual action and remove your pages from results. This check fetches a URL twice, once with a Googlebot user-agent and once as a real browser, and compares the HTTP status, response size, and title tag. It matters because AI answer engines and Google alike must see the same content a user sees to trust and cite it; a real crawler-vs-user mismatch can quietly cost you rankings and visibility.
Cloaking is showing search-engine crawlers different content than you show human visitors, usually to manipulate rankings. Google treats it as a spam-policy violation.
Yes. Cloaking can trigger a manual action, which removes affected pages or the whole site from Google's index until you fix it and request a review.
It compares status, response size, and title between a Googlebot and a browser fetch as a fast first-pass signal. JavaScript-rendered or IP/geo-based cloaking needs deeper, separate checks.
No. Responsive design and dynamic serving to different users are allowed. Cloaking specifically means the crawler sees something different from what any user sees.
Free tools show you WHAT to fix. The full audit + the autonomous team of 20 AI agents fix it end-to-end — strategy, content, GEO, internal links, publishing and day-2 upkeep.
All free tools →cookies
The Matrix already knows everything about you — cookies are small change by comparison. The choice, as always, is yours: