GEO playbook

GEO for SaaS & B2B: how to get cited by AI

B2B research is shifting into AI: the buyer asks 'best platform for…', 'X vs Y', 'how to set up…' — and gets an answer naming products. The winner is whoever's docs, comparisons and integrations the engine can read and cite.

Red pill → waitlist

GEO for SaaS & B2B: how to get cited by AI

Where you lose AI answers

  • AI recommends competitors for 'best tool for…'.
  • Docs render on the client (JS) — to an AI crawler they're empty.
  • No comparison pages and no llms.txt — nothing to cite and no map to navigate.

How people ask AI

«best tool for …»«… vs … comparison»«how to set up … integration»«alternatives to …»

GEO checklist for this niche

▸
Comparisons and 'alternatives'

'X vs Y' and 'alternatives to Z' pages — the main entry points into B2B AI answers.

▸
Docs in HTML

Server-render docs/help — AI crawlers don't execute JavaScript.

▸
llms.txt + structure

A site map for AI + schema (SoftwareApplication, FAQ, HowTo) and direct answers.

▸
Case studies and numbers

Concrete results and metrics — engines cite them more readily than generic claims.

▸
Product E-E-A-T

Expert authors, sameAs, mentions/integrations — vendor trust signals.

Want this done for your site — end to end?

Red pill → waitlist

FAQ

Why are SaaS docs often invisible to AI?

If help and docs render on the client via JavaScript, AI crawlers see an empty page. You need server rendering — then the content becomes citable.

What gives a quick win in B2B?

Comparison and 'alternatives' pages, llms.txt and structured data. Start there and run them through the GEO checker.