GEO playbook

GEO for HR & recruiting: how to get cited by AI

Job seekers increasingly check salaries and hiring terms with AI engines, not job boards — and AI cites whoever gives dated, numeric answers. To get in, you need JobPosting markup, salary data and an expert author.

GEO for HR & recruiting: how to get cited by AI

Where you lose AI answers

  • AI cites big job aggregators, not your platform.
  • Salary ranges go stale within a quarter — AI grabs competitors' fresher numbers.
  • Hiring guides with no HR author and no data get skipped by AI as fluff.

How people ask AI

«how much does a role earn in city»«how to hire a specialist without an agency»«what to put in a role job ad to get applicants»«profession salary range 2026»

GEO checklist for this niche

JobPosting markup

Vacancies with title, baseSalary (MonetaryAmount), validThrough — AI pulls structured salary and terms data.

Salaries with data and a date

Numeric ranges with a source and measurement date — AI cites confirmed, fresh figures.

HR author with a profile

Recruiter name, specialization (knowsAbout), hiring experience — an E-E-A-T signal for AI.

Direct «how to hire X» answer

A short, exact step-by-step right after the section heading, before the details.

FAQPage and freshness

Hiring and salary Q&A in markup plus an «updated» date after the market shifts.

Want this done for your site — end to end?

FAQ

Why does AI cite aggregators, not us?

Big job platforms have many structured vacancies and fresh salaries. You beat them with niche expertise: JobPosting markup, authored data-backed guides and FAQPage for narrow roles.

Where should a staffing agency start?

Add JobPosting markup, dated salary ranges and an HR author, give direct «how to hire X» answers and FAQPage, then run your pages through the GEO checker.