How ready are the top eSIM brands to be read and cited by AI agents? We ran our free agent-readiness checker on each — and the market leader scores 0.
Snapshot: 2026-07-03
| # | site | agent-readiness | verdict |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | holafly.com | 80 | ready |
| 2 | yesim.app | 80 | ready |
| 3 | gigsky.com | 65 | partial |
| 4 | maya.net | 60 | partial |
| 5 | ubigi.com | 30 | not ready |
| 6 | flexiroam.com | 30 | not ready |
| 7 | instabridge.com | 20 | not ready |
| 8 | simoptions.com | 20 | not ready |
| 9 | airalo.com | 0 | not ready |
| 10 | nomad.com | 0 | not ready |
| 11 | truphone.com | 0 | not ready |
Method: each site's homepage was scored 0–100 by our free agent-readiness checker across six machine-readability signals — structured data (JSON-LD), llms.txt, llms-full.txt, author markup, sameAs entity links and markdown alternates. A high score means an AI agent can read and cite the site; a low score means it's a brick wall to the engines writing AI answers.
Not ranked. We could not fetch these (anti-bot / unreachable), so they're excluded rather than scored 0:
saily.com
Where does your site land?
Check your own site's agent-readiness →Free tools show you WHAT to fix. The full audit + the autonomous team of 20 AI agents fix it end-to-end — strategy, content, GEO, internal links, publishing and day-2 upkeep.
All free tools →cookies
The Matrix already knows everything about you — cookies are small change by comparison. The choice, as always, is yours: